The spleen acts as a filter in the body's fight against microorganisms and foreign particles that enter the body, and produces protective antibodies in the body. People who have had their spleen removed for one reason or another are susceptible to a variety of infections and bacteria.

The spleen takes part in the production of blood and contains red blood cells, which, in the event of a crisis in the body, can be included in the general blood flow and maintain a normal state, if necessary. Like any human organ, with its possible diseases, it can cause very serious problems.

Why is the spleen removed?

This organ is located deep enough in the human body - in the abdominal cavity. The human body thus protects its surface, soft and delicate, very sensitive to physical damage. A variety of injuries received as a result of car accidents, unforeseen falls and blows, or in a fight, can literally tear the spleen to pieces, after which there is no way to restore or strengthen it, and you have to resort to its removal, which causes great harm to human health .

How long can you live without a spleen

Of course, in the absence of the spleen, a person will be able to somehow live, thanks to the enormous possibilities for compensating our body, but still, its loss, as an organ that provides infectious protection for the body, to a large extent causes great harm. That is why before the operation, the patient undergoes a vaccination procedure against the most dangerous viruses.

After the spleen is removed, its functions are taken over by the human liver and bone marrow. But blood purification from dead platelets is not performed, and they circulate in the human body, threatening the occurrence of thrombosis. For this reason, patients who have undergone spleen removal are prescribed anticoagulants - special medications that thin the blood and prevent platelets from sticking together. People who have undergone surgery to remove the spleen should be constantly under the supervision of doctors - hematologists.

Why is the spleen enlarged

The increase in the volume of the spleen occurs precisely because it fulfills its direct functions of protecting the body, because at the same time it produces a large number of leukocytes. It can increase in volume by more than three times. And when the infection is defeated, he will return to normal again and will weigh about 150 grams.

Unexpected enlargement of the spleen (spleen pathology) sometimes occurs when there is a cyst on the spleen or when there is liver disease such as cirrhosis or hepatitis. There are cases of its increase due to the occurrence of a blood clot in the blood vein of the spleen. As a result of such cases, there is a risk of direct damage to the organ.

A disease such as a spleen infarction occurs due to the necrosis of the tissues surrounding it, to which the human abdominal cavity reacts with pain.

The English writer Cecilia Ahern gave a surprisingly accurate definition of the concept of a house: “It is not a place, but a state of mind.” The short word “home” is boundlessly filled with warmth, comfort and tranquility.

Each person has their own idea of ​​a home. I used to ask myself: is it possible to live without a house? But now I know for sure: it is impossible, because the house is the source and support for a person. No wonder the expression “my house is my fortress” has taken root in the minds of many people.

He will cover his “fortress” in difficult times, protect

from experiences, and native walls will warm the soul.

If people did not have their own living space, they could not experience happiness from the visits of friends and relatives. The absence of a home can be compared with the absence of a family and homeland. After all, a house is not just a building with a roof that protects from bad weather, it is a place where a personality is formed, foundations are laid. A lot of memories are connected with the house of my childhood. And no matter how many years pass, you will always be welcome, because understanding and care reign in your own home. It is dear to every person, because it connects the past with the present.

The theme of the house is significant for any writer. Through

description of living conditions, the authors give us an idea about the heroes of the works. M. Yu. Lermontov identified the house with the homeland. His works are permeated with sad love for the motherland. In the poem “Motherland”, the poet admits that he loves her, but with a “strange love”. He is close to the unpretentious village life: “a hut covered with straw”, “a window with carved shutters”. In describing nature, Lermontov conveys the beauty and mystery of Russia. For him, the homeland is a home that attracts, delights and fascinates.

Most people inseparably connect the house with the family, but on the example of the heroine of the “Telegram”, K. Paustovsky shows that sometimes it happens differently. Anastasia leaves for Leningrad, leaving her mother and father's house. Only after the death of the dearest person does she realize how close this dilapidated house and its mistress, who sincerely loved her, are close to her. Will Anastasia be able to fill the orphaned building with warmth and comfort, which her mother skillfully created? Apparently she can't...

Every living being needs a home. Birds and animals also build houses: they build nests, dig minks and create their own families. But for a person, the concept of a house includes much more: it is not just protection from the influence of the outside world, but also a spiritual support!

Other works on this topic:

1. How to live a life that is “high and interesting” is the problem that L. Serova reflects on. Quite well-known examples from the history of Russia help the author to reveal this issue: ...
2. Can an honest person commit a dishonorable act? Often the heroes of literary works can be clearly divided into "positive" and "negative". But in Karamzin's story "Poor Lisa"...
3. The early works of M. Gorky reveal the foundations of the young writer's worldview, his philosophical thought, his understanding of man and human qualities. The central image of the romantic works of this period is...
4. Description of the house in English with translation We all live somewhere: in an apartment, in a house, etc. As the English say, “My home – my...
5. Home, the feeling of home warmth and comfort play an important role in the life of every person. No wonder there is an expression “My home is my castle”. Really feeling at home...
6. Sacrificing one's personal interests in order to make other people's lives more prosperous is called self-sacrifice. Man is considered a highly organized being, familiar with such concepts, ...
7. History is made by society, but at the same time, someone always controls it. It can be either a group of people or one person: a leader by nature, fanatically devoted...

Can a person live without feelings? This question sooner or later arises in every person. Is it worth replacing emotions with reason? In the world you can find thousands of people who believe that life is worth living, including common sense, because it's calmer and more stable. Others, on the contrary, cannot imagine their lives without constant bright outbursts of emotions. As always, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Let's find out how to try to balance these two antipodes: rationality and emotionality?

Intelligence

Every person tends to fear something and doubt something. Cold reason often “rescues” us: it protects us from tragedies, helps us comprehend difficult situations and come to a certain conclusion. Life without feelings saves us from disappointment, but it also does not allow us to sincerely rejoice. Can a person live without feelings? Definitely - it can't. That's why we are human beings to show emotions.

Another thing is that inside us there is a constant struggle between reason and feelings. A person is not perfect, he almost every day has to think about what to do. Very often we react to this or that situation, guided by generally accepted rules.

For example, if the boss undeservedly criticizes us, then we, as a rule, do not react very violently, but agree or calmly try to justify ourselves. With this version of events, the mind wins, which awakens in us. Of course, feelings play an important role, but being able to control them if necessary is a good quality.

The senses

Can a person live without feelings? We are not robots, each of us is constantly experiencing a variety of emotions. Reason is given to people so that they can show emotions. Anger, joy, love, fear, sadness - who does not know all these feelings? The characterization is very broad and multifaceted. It's just that people show them differently. Someone immediately splashes out all their joy or anger on others, while someone hides their emotions very deeply.

In our time, the manifestation of feelings is not considered "fashionable." If a guy sings songs under the balcony of his beloved, then this is more likely to be called eccentricity, and not a manifestation of the most sincere feelings. We have become afraid to show our feelings even to the closest people. Very often, in pursuit of a prosperous life, we forget about our emotional state. Many people really try to hide their feelings as far as possible. In modern society, it is believed that the ability to show emotions is a sign of weakness. A person who has feelings will always be more vulnerable than a person who has everything built on the calculation. But at the same time, an emotional person can be happier than a rationalist.

Various emotions can bring both great happiness and excruciating pain. Can a person live without feelings? Can't and shouldn't! If you know how to feel, then you are living an interesting life. Know how to rejoice in simple things, not be upset over trifles and look at the world with optimism. If you can be “friends” with your emotional and rational “I”, then you will definitely achieve harmony and happiness.

Tutorial:
learn to analyze their actions.

Developing: to promote the development of schoolchildren's skills to plan, implement, analyze and evaluate joint activities;

through watching animated films, develop abilities in collective activities, cultivating the qualities necessary to strengthen interpersonal relationships in the classroom, in society; develop partnerships; practice the skills of mutual assistance in solving various problems; to develop in students a culture of communication (communication skills).

Educational: to promote the unity of the class team, the formation of students' respect for the norms and values ​​of life; to reveal the idea of ​​what good deeds and personal qualities of a person are; contribute to the formation of moral qualities: the ability to be friends, to cherish friendship, not to show vanity and pride from the actions done.

Download:

Preview:

Can a person live on his own?

Our actions and our loved ones. Vanity.

Goals:

Tutorial: teach children to build relationships with loved ones;
learn to analyze their actions.

Developing: to promote the development of schoolchildren's skills to plan, implement, analyze and evaluate joint activities;

through watching animated films, develop abilities in collective activities, cultivating the qualities necessary to strengthen interpersonal relationships in the classroom, in society;

develop partnerships;

practice the skills of mutual assistance in solving various problems;

to develop in students a culture of communication (communication skills).
Educational: to promote the unity of the class team, the formation of students' respect for the norms and values ​​of life; to reveal the idea of ​​what good deeds and personal qualities of a person are; contribute to the formation of moral qualities: the ability to be friends, to cherish friendship, not to show vanity and pride from the actions done.

P . Hello guys! Today we will talk about a topic that is very important in our time: “Can a person live on his own?”.

Student survey.

And how can the proverb “One man is not a warrior” apply here? Of course, each of us needs support. Every day, each of us takes a different position in different situations. In the morning we are a daughter or a son, coming to school, we become a student or a student, a classmate, a roommate, etc. And so, every day, our roles change. Imagine if this didn't happen in our lives. How would we feel?

You are at an age where school takes up most of your time. It is very important that your class, your so-called school family bring you joy and positive emotions from communicating with each other.

You have questionnaires on the tables that you need to fill out. Complete the sentences in task 1.

After filling, view the m / f "Bridge" and its discussion (summing up). The main meaning of the m/f is that it is important to help and yield to each other.

It often happens that we do not always pay attention to what and how we said to someone, or how we answered the question we were asked, how we acted in the situation that arose, and how others reacted to it ... Is it necessary to pay attention to the people who surround us. Should we think about how they feel when we offend them with something. How do we feel if we have been offended or betrayed? What actions can people do? (discussion of issues).

Parable about actions. Discussion.

Because we have found out that there are good and bad deeds, then let's define the categories of the following qualities that are important in communication: Goodwill, Rudeness, Deceitfulness, Patience, Compliance, Responsiveness, Indifference, Caring, Harmfulness, Avarice, Honesty, Generosity, Pugnacity, Greed, Selflessness, Intolerance, Envy, Tact, Responsibility, Flattery, Meanness, Selfishness, Bragging, Politeness, Sociability, Vanity, Arrogance. These words are shown on the slide.

After discussing the positive and negative qualities, pay attention to the word "VANITY". This addiction to vain (vain, useless) fame, love of honors, the desire to look good in the eyes of others.

A vain person is a person who is afraid of what people will think and say about him; this is a person who is ready to buy their approval at any cost: to become unworthy of himself. At the same time, the most important thing for such a person is not who he really is, but what impression he makes on others. Praise and blame become the main guidelines in the life of a vain person. Vanity, therefore, often leads to duplicity, when a person behaves differently with loved ones and strangers. Such a person is looking for all possible ways for personal superiority, whether they are legal or not, he seeks to rise above the crowd by any means. Vanity can be a serious motivation that makes a person study, achieve success in work, have a family. However, there is a lie behind this whole picture. In the depths of vanity, a sense of one's own insignificance and baseness, multiplied by infantile pride, is hidden. People can become vain as a result of prolonged humiliation. Subsequently, they spend their whole lives trying to prove to themselves and others their own greatness.

M / f "On pride and not only."

Summarizing. Reflection.

The bitter thought about how much a person could achieve if it were not for the need to earn a living, probably visited each of us. With the start of experiments on the introduction of an unconditional basic income, it becomes increasingly difficult not to think about how you could spend your completely free day from work. But these thoughts also have a dark side: what if nothing comes of it? What if, without the usual eight hours of enjoyable or not-so-pleasant work activity, we simply won’t be able to live day after day? Suddenly we are not able to paint landscapes, read Plato, and even more so creatively communicate with each other seven days a week?

Nikita Setov

Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Political Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Imagine that you no longer need to get up at half past seven in the morning, pour yourself a cup of nasty instant coffee and drag yourself to the other end of the city to the office in order to receive a certain amount of money at the end of the month, which is still not enough to satisfy all your needs , but which allows you to exist relatively comfortably. And suddenly you find out about the decision of the government to introduce an unconditional basic income in the amount of, say, the same amount that you earn in a hated office on the other side of town. I think you will immediately experience euphoria: there is no more need to work hard, you can devote more time to your family, hobbies, other activities, and so on. But what will follow this?

I am sure that many will talk about the rise of culture, a powerful impetus for the development of social projects, new forms of social interaction, and so on. In my opinion, none of this will happen. The ensuing euphoria will soon be replaced by individual and social apathy, which in its extreme and most common form will involve sitting on the couch in front of the TV with a bag of chips. The reason for this unflattering scenario is that the freedom that individuals gain from the emergence of free time and income independent of work activity will be too uncertain. A person of the 21st century is constantly in need of schemes regulating his activities, established traditional models of behavior, where every hour and minute is scheduled in the organizer. We should also not forget that a person living in a capitalist society of the 21st century is a working person - and nothing else. The introduction of an unconditional basic income can become a trigger for the destruction of our main social function - labor activity, which we exchange for wages.

Sergey Shklyudov-Riekstinsh

political strategist, journalist

It is understood that all the same, with a reduction in working time, some limit will be reached, a border beyond which you still have to pick up a shovel and dig a trench "from here" and "before lunch." Even Karl Marx, who promised that after the end of history and the advent of communism, when each person will be able to choose what to do - fishing, criticism, or Winston Churchill's favorite pastime, namely the construction of a brick wall to nowhere - there will still be room for forced labor. Even in a utopian paradise, each person, overcoming their laziness and frustration, will have to take on “an hour or two” of negative labor. True, at the same time, communism assumed the overcoming of alienation and the disclosure of all the creative abilities of man. It was believed, just like in Boris Akunin's "pedagogical" novel "Azazel", that nature created people who get an incredible buzz from washing dishes or laying trenches. Capitalism partially brought Marx's utopia to life, shifting some of the worries to robots and technology. Karl Marx himself saw salvation from labor in robots and technology.

Even today, in the postmodern twilight, political theory still looks to the notion of a work of two ivory towers. And their names are "capitalism" and "socialism". From childhood, from the “textbook on economics for the first class”, we were inspired by the theory of the tender German statistician Ernst Engel, which in a simplified form says that “when all the material needs of a person are satisfied, the demand for spiritual goods wakes up in him.” We do not want bread and circuses at the same time, but sequentially. A "spiritual product" can only be fabricated by an "internally free man", a proletarian of mental labor who has overcome his alienation. This is where vulgar capitalism and vulgar socialism converge. However, a funny thing is observed. Even though capitalism today is still characterized as “alienation”, “coercion”, “unfreedom”, and socialism as “freedom”, “overcoming alienation”, “limitless creativity”, in fact, two equal formations, like the two magnetic poles of the Earth, have already begun to swap places.

Capitalism today gives us complete freedom of entrepreneurship and creativity, cloud services, bitcoins and outsourcing. Socialism, on the other hand, is the opposite: the left-wing governments of modern Europe are faced with the acute question of how to feed the unemployed majority at the expense of the active capitalist minority, how to overcome the economic, demographic, migration crisis and the crisis of mass unemployment at once. As a result, we see something surprising: in Labor, pre-Thatcher England, the crisis led to the fact that there were three working days left in the week and the masses of working people demanded one thing - work; in Schroeder's Germany, the Social Democrats are implementing the Agenda 2010 program, the goal of which is to cut benefits, tighten labor laws and thereby “shake up the market”; in modern Denmark in 2011, the center-left government proposed to increase the working day by 12 minutes, through this to extort an extra hour a week from the market and through this “raise the economy”

We come to the conclusion that today, developed capitalism symbolically brings us liberation, and Eurobureaucratic socialism, on the contrary, is forced to work and work. Therefore, to the question whether liberation from the Work (with a capital letter) will lead to cultural growth, the answer is a definite yes. But only not by that direct way of the development of the quantity of material needs into spiritual quality. And just as Karl Marx bequeathed: through technology, progress and total robotization. It would also be appropriate to recall the practice of unconditional income, which is being introduced today in Finland and Switzerland, by no means by European bureaucrats and fans of budget rules. The state gives you several thousand euros a month, pushes you in the back and, as if inadvertently, says, to quote a well-known demotivator: "Develop, asshole." And we already have all the tools for development.

Dmitry Akhtyrsky

candidate of philosophical sciences,
independent researcher, USA

So, imagine that the program for the introduction of an unconditional basic income has come into action. To begin with, I note that this idea is not as radical as many people think. In any case, such social innovations as universal military service and then its abolition, the system of pensions and a fixed eight-hour working day, women's equality and so on - all these are just as revolutionary transformations. Society, despite the fact that a large number of individuals and social groups were afraid of these innovations, went for these changes, since the experiment is a basic element of the reformist social space.

The system of welfare, pensions and guaranteed paid holidays is precisely the elements of the social structure that precede the introduction of an unconditional basic income.

Will people be able to manage their free time in such a way that the lack of need to take care of their survival does not lead them to degradation? I think the answer should be generally positive. That guarantee - the functioning of the same pension system.

I will not touch on the economic problems of introducing an unconditional basic income here. As for whether the cultural level of the society that implements this idea will rise or fall as a result, the result will depend on whether the society will be able to transform the education system and other institutions in such a way as to help the individual develop higher motivations for creative activity. I believe that the transition to higher motivations for activity is perhaps the most important task of mankind if it intends to follow the path of development. Refusal of experiments in this direction would be tantamount to a rejection of development, the recognition of the fundamental insurmountable inferiority of human civilization.